 |
| |
| |
Robert A. Lowe
DDS, FAGD, FICD,
FADI, FACD, maintains a private
practice in Charlotte, N.C.
A Diplomate of the American Board of
Aesthetic Dentistry,
Dr. Lowe lectures internationally
and is co-chair
of Advanstar
Dental Media’s continuing education
advisory board. He can be reached at
704-364-4711 or at
boblowedds@aol.com. |
|
|
|
One benefit of a direct composite
restoration is the ability to repair, or “renew” an
existing fractured or marginally defective, but
clinically serviceable, restoration. Unlike the
restorative interface process that uses conventional
alloy or gold metallic restorations that do not
“seal” the tooth, with the enamel and dentin
adhesive process, areas of the restoration not
affected by the “localized” failure remain well
sealed clinically.
In addition, the restorative interface procedure
does not require removal of all of the old
restorative material for the remake.
Nonetheless, it is challenging to
successfully add new composite material to existing
material. Some clinicians believe that the “oxygen
inhibited layer” is required to place composite in
increments; others, including Drs. B.I. Suh and L.W.
Blank, disagree. Because the polymerization of
composite continues many hours after the initial
photo curing, increments of composite can be added
to previously cured increments
during the build-up phase of the restorative
process, as long as the composite surface remains
uncontaminated.
However, this does not appear to be
true for older composite restorations that have
completed the conversion process and have been
contaminated by the oral environment. This article
will present a technique for repairing such an older
composite restoration—a disto-incisal fracture of an
existing direct composite veneer.
The clinical case Determine shade,
acid-etch The patient presented with a disto-incisal
fracture of a recently
placed direct composite veneer (Figure 1). It is
important to remember the “restorative formula” (the
shades
selected and their order of placement) from the
patient’s chart when multiple shades and/or
opacities are used. If this information is not
available, use the appropriate shade guide to narrow
the shade selection,
and then extrude a small amount of the actual
composite to evaluate the color. In this case, the
fracture occurred in the enamel (transparent)
portion of the build up, so the dentin shade was not
needed in the repair of the area. After verification
of shade selection, the fractured area is resurfaced
using a micro-abrader with 50-micron aluminum oxide
particles (Figure 2). This creates micro-mechanical
retention, increases surface energy to help wet the
surface, and removes unsuitable contaminated
material (Figure 3).
Next, the area is etched with 37%
phosphoric acid for 15 seconds (Figure 4), then is
thoroughly rinsed and air-dried, to thereby ensure
thorough decontamination of the existing composite
surface and to etch any adjacent enamel and dentin
surfaces.
Note: A traditional dentin
adhesive can be placed on any enamel and dentin
surfaces after first rewetting with a desensitizer,
such as AcquaSeal (AcquaMed Technologies). Then,
light cure the area.
|